Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 425 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Memory 20.3 1-Core 15.8 2-Core 23.3 13% 19.8 Pts	4-Core 56.5 8-Core 74.5 8% 65.5 Pts	64-Core 39.5 2% 39.5 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310 4,147 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 3100) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 289GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 128 5.6 3.1 5.5 2.6 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.7% Very poor	Read 102 Write 85.7 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 46.6 17% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 6 23% 7.77 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 18.9 DQ Mixed 13.9 12% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 3x2GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 533 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 6.3 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 319 12% 319 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples	10x
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 820AMDBench 50%, 1,512 samples	6x

RAM
CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBCorsairBench 30%, 22 samples	6x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	3x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16