User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory11 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 16:50
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 193
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 352
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 62
Parallax 89.8
52% 71.9 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 54.1
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 181 174 177 181 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 325
Mixed 360
SusWrite 202
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 46.7
155% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
92GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 108
Write 115
Mixed 72
SusWrite 104
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
146GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 102 103 104 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 99
Write 86.9
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 102
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
162GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 162 164 165 163 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 99.5
Write 87.4
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 161
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 1302 PSD34G160081 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1302 PSD34G160081 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback