Asrock H170M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H170M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151030
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 17:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 425
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 111
Parallax 104
82% 105 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 94.1
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 161 143 141 135 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 424
Write 414
Mixed 335
SusWrite 154
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 50.3
165% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 134
131% 204 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
396GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 122 125 124 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 123
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB
723GB free
Firmware: 0143
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47% Average
Read 77.2
Write 51.7
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 86.4
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-029.A00G Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.3% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 25.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H170M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $411
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback