Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '20 at 16:49
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 186 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 614 59% 488 Pts	64-Core 995 62% 995 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	109% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 159 Parallax 178 115% 159 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 169 Splatting 110 103% 127 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 729 430 430 431 431 430 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 2,241 Write 1,906 Mixed 1477 SusWrite 480 340% 1,526 MB/s	4K Read 52.3 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 69.1 231% 80.4 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 628 DQ Mixed 604 461% 622 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 302%
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 45GB free Firmware: SAFM12.G SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 142 156 155 113 120 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	74% Very good	Read 471 Write 442 Mixed 344 SusWrite 184 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 30.1 104% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 181 161% 236 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54 11,103 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 145GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 150 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.7 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 476 Write 431 Mixed 394 SusWrite 102 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 25 113% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 35.8 85% 172 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 617GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 97 95 96 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 98.8 Write 93.5 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 95 62% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 62%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 81GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 94 93 93 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 61.4 Write 71.4 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 93.1 50% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 59%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 132GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 63 63 64 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 83 Write 54 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 63.4 47% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 247GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 63 68 67 66 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 28.1 Write 68.9 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 67.2 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 67%
Mass Storage Device 120GB 1,006 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 36.5 Write 34.4 Mixed 34 45% 35 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 9.9 758% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 9.2 DQ Write 11.8 DQ Mixed 10.3 786% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 4x8GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	89.3% Excellent	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 33.2 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 25.5 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 95.9 42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $540

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16