Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 761
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 175
Parallax 176
150% 178 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 156
Splatting 112
121% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 858 857 853 844 839 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2461
Write 2,265
Mixed 1,683
SusWrite 890
408% 1,825 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 98.5
332% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,445
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,226
933% 1,265 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 313%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 276 276 276 277 276 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 439
Mixed 418
SusWrite 295
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 55.9
194% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 235
211% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 118%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
360GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 101
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 119 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 124
Write 102
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 88%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 118 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 166
Write 159
Mixed 99.2
SusWrite 118
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
836GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 88.7
116% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 30.8
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 31.8
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback