Acer Nitro AN515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Octavia_PKS
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 08:02
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 228
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 612
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Acer(1025 1366) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.30.03
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 17.5
10% 29.4 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 15.3
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 285 278 266 253 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 473
Write 322
Mixed 235
SusWrite 268
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 24.3
81% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 97.1
DQ Mixed 41.7
39% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
569GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 149 150 150 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 149
Write 149
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 146
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (85th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-43 Builds (Compare 1,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback