Intel DQ67OW

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	INTEL_ DQ67OW__
Motherboard	Intel DQ67OW (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110520
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31260L 310 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 86.7 2-Core 164 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 337 36% 290 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.61% Terrible	Lighting 5.57 Reflection 8.27 Parallax 1.97 4% 5.27 fps	MRender 8.14 Gravity 3.77 Splatting 5.7 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.61% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0831C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 43 40 38 44 46 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 450 Write 387 Mixed 235 SusWrite 89.3 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 17.2 79% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 30.6 62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DQ67OW Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Intel DQ67OW

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	3x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	1x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	1x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x

RAM
99U5595-003.A00LF 99U5474-012.A00LF 99U5595-003.A00LF 99U5474-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 1 sample	1x
99U5474-028.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 25%, 3,328 samples	1x
M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 39%, 619 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Intel DQ67OW

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Intel DQ67OW

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)