Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31260L 310 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 80.4 2-Core 156 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 337 37% 293 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.61% Terrible	Lighting 5.57 Reflection 8.23 Parallax 1.75 4% 5.18 fps	MRender 8.19 Gravity 3.77 Splatting 5.7 5% 5.88 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.61% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0831C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 42 43 38 39 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 452 Write 390 Mixed 248 SusWrite 86.9 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 15.9 81% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 30.1 52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 15.9 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x

RAM
99U5595-003.A00LF 99U5474-012.A00LF 99U5595-003.A00LF 99U5474-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 1 sample	1x
99U5474-028.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 25%, 3,328 samples	1x
M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 39%, 619 samples	1x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $250

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16