Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200402
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 22:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 946
93% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,428
88% 1,428 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 28.2
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 26.4
23% 29 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 36.8
29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viper M.2 VPN100 1TB
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2082 348 778 904 897 915 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,209
Write 862
Mixed 774
SusWrite 987
215% 958 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 30.3
143% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 63
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 986
580% 577 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 168%
Great: 287%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
107GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 434 438 443 410 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 434
Mixed 384
SusWrite 407
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 52.1
171% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
800GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 152 156 154 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 138
Write 170
Mixed 85
SusWrite 154
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
420GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 113 113 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 90
Mixed 57
SusWrite 112
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 24.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback