ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL553VD

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus GL553VD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '20 at 03:43
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 83.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 224 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 551 62% 487 Pts	64-Core 536 33% 536 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5148 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Lighting 32.9 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 33.6 27% 30.5 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 32.1 Splatting 22.7 24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 247 265 289 281 319 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,728 Write 1,108 Mixed 484 SusWrite 311 200% 908 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 177 4K Mixed 54.3 234% 92.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,055 DQ Write 927 DQ Mixed 697 603% 893 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 546GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 124 126 126 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 138 Write 124 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 124 74% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB 18,452 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 12.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,838x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1,141x
Core i7-7820HQIntelBench 63%, 15,851 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,447x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,528x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	4x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	274x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	249x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	203x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	664x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	312x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	186x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback