Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '20 at 23:44
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$125
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 876
84% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1834 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 38.1
33% 36.9 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 36.4
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 1.7 2.3 8.3 48 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 450
Write 293
Mixed 316
SusWrite 63.5
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 19.1
76% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99.7
DQ Write 65.6
DQ Mixed 42.4
42% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
205GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 142 458 461 459 467 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56% Above average
Read 419
Write 449
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 335
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 9
62% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 16.4
14% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 9.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback