Asus GL552VX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL552VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VX
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 08 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 147
57% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 461
44% 361 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1060) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 6.47
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 14.1
8% 9.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 154 108 68 86 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 376
Write 334
Mixed 281
SusWrite 121
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 16.3
59% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 230
193% 280 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 104%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
103GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 89
Write 53.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 72.5
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1315 CT8G4SFS8213.C8FBR1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.5% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VX Builds (Compare 785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback