Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190613
Uptime	19.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '20 at 21:22
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 70.3 1-Core 148 2-Core 295 90% 171 Pts	4-Core 589 8-Core 1,169 104% 879 Pts	64-Core 2084 129% 2084 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 8670) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 111 Parallax 98.7 96% 109 fps	MRender 176 Gravity 135 Splatting 105 110% 139 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167 10,240 User benchmarks, average bench 340% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1282 651 485 515 523 552 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 2,070 Write 3,319 Mixed 2093 SusWrite 668 460% 2,037 MB/s	4K Read 51.9 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 74.5 254% 92.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,170 DQ Write 862 DQ Mixed 965 735% 999 MB/s
Poor: 183% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 496%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 352GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 397 386 370 359 340 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 433 Mixed 396 SusWrite 374 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 53 174% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 133%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 6GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 94 95 97 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 108 Write 85.5 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 99.2 65% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.8 182% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 739GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 127 128 128 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 114 Write 100 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 127 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 98%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 128GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 49GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 85 86 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 91 Write 83.3 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 85.4 110% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 5.7 386% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 48%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 0GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 77.8 Write 10.3 Mixed 16.5 32% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.2 80% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 2x16GB 857 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.9% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 26.6 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 25.4 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,163x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	869x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	608x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $835Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $89Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	480x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	312x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,809

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16