Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 18:53
Run Duration464 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 60
2-Core 114
52% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 206
24% 189 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.24 fps
MRender 0.05
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 0.04
0% 0.04 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 89 89 57 135 66 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.1% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 30.8
Mixed 11.1
SusWrite 86
9% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 5.2
11% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 282%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 38 34 17 45 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 15.9
Write 10.6
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 29.9
13% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
53% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 138%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 18 17 10 25 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Read 7
Write 8.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 15.7
7% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 195%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]164(F/R) 99[2/7/4]164(F/R) 99[2/7/4]164(F/R) 99[2/7/4]164(F/R) 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.2% Below average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback