Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150115
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 15:03
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 207
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 376
53% 391 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 866E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 113
Parallax 131
99% 122 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 120
Splatting 97.3
102% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 13 70 39 48 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 227
Write 97.3
Mixed 113
SusWrite 70.3
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 14
59% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 30.2
24% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
26GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 95 166 107 122 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 466
Write 274
Mixed 339
SusWrite 152
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 31.5
133% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 200
175% 258 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
111GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 92 94 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 63.4
Write 64
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 91.7
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 69%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
98GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 68.4
Write 74
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 64.1
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,003
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback