Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 23:01
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 95.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 424
50% 388 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 866E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 117
Parallax 122
105% 123 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 125
Splatting 64.6
92% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 14 67 119 14 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 194
Write 90.1
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 63.6
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 24
81% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 93.4
83% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
33GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 100 128 109 107 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 451
Write 187
Mixed 329
SusWrite 147
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 38.6
149% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 201
175% 257 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
111GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 92 92 93 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 64
Write 62
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 92.1
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 69%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
98GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 65 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 75.8
Write 71
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 64.2
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,003
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback