Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 14:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 126
54% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 230
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 27.5
0% 18.9 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 32.6
24% 28.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 67 79 79 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 400
Write 73
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 69.7
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 10.6
54% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 29.6
DQ Mixed 32.4
34% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback