TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Amazon i3en.metal

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmazon i3en.metal  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon Not Specified
Memory749.8 GB free of 768 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 03:21
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 192
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 776
68% 576 Pts
64-Core 3,255
202% 3,255 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 70.2%
 Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 117 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 375
Write 195
Mixed 272
SusWrite 56.5
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 7.9
36% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 29.2%
 Great: 70%
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 7.5TB
55.5TB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,235
Write 4,025
Mixed 2,086
627% 2,782 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 30.4
131% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 1,002
750% 995 MB/s
Poor: 173% Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK H... 767GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
147% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 78.6
MC Mixed 56.4
178% 62.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback