HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cd0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cd0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8354
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180112
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 01:36
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 42.2
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 41.9
25% 37.8 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 128
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8354) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 9
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.25 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 8.78
6% 7.86 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 40 38 51 41 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 37.6
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 44.1
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.3
141% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cd0xx Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cd0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback