| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5KPL (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091111 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 06 '20 at 18:00 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.3%
Average
|
40% 61.9 Pts
|
21% 157 Pts
|
10% 158 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1499 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
18% 19.8 fps
|
20% 24.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 125 125 132 131 MB/s
|
35.5%
Below average
|
43% 192 MB/s
|
55% 16.3 MB/s
|
13% 18 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25
29GB free
Firmware: WT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 57 56 56 56 56 MB/s
|
29.6%
Poor
|
36% 49.3 MB/s
|
158% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
10GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 3.1 4.7 1.4 4.3 4.6 MB/s
|
4.36%
Terrible
|
8% 7.75 MB/s
|
12% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16%
Very poor
|
14% 4.87 GB/s
|
14% 4.9 GB/s
|
36% 112 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5KPL Builds (Compare 51 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5KPL
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo E6550Intel $20Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600 GSONvidiaBench 5%, 1,167 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |