Intel X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X58  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 15:00
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 155
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 478
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 17
17% 17.7 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 22
Splatting 16.8
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,216
Write 1,850
Mixed 2,347
546% 2471 MB/s
4K Read 249
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 155
658% 186 MB/s
DQ Read 639
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 534
404% 545 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
22GB free
Firmware: ECFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 170 170 170 170 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Above average
Read 164
Write 168
Mixed 166
SusWrite 170
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 26.3
86% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 168
119% 150 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 50%
Great: 223%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
146GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 105 107 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 101
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 29.1
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 28.7
22% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1066, 33 MHz
16384, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.9
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $97
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback