To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 22:06
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 174
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 697
62% 523 Pts
64-Core 1,630
101% 1,630 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 22.1
20% 23 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 21.5
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN2 500NVMe-M.2/80 500GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1235 259 258 240 693 678 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,341
Write 1,323
Mixed 1,035
SusWrite 560
239% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 35
146% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 536
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 501
375% 501 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 154%
Great: 263%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 188 190 188 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 188
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 188
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70DH0- 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 36.6
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback