Advantech UTC-520F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAdvantech UTC-520F  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 146
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 223
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 5.84
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 12
7% 7.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64ASTMM0000A 64GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 100 101 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 472
Write 103
Mixed 156
SusWrite 98.7
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 34.4
126% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 111
92% 136 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AQD-SD3L4GN16-HG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback