Dell Inspiron 3650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Inspiron 3650  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0C2XKD
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 619
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 360
Dell(1028 0B04) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 24.8
0% 17.9 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 31.2
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hgst HDN724040ALE640 500GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 426 442 438 441 437 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 479
Write 440
Mixed 349
SusWrite 419
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 42.4
153% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 255
212% 307 MB/s
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 137 138 139 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 138
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
21GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 12 10 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 120
Write 38.5
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 21.1
64% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.6
144% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 36%
EPSON Stylus Storage 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 4.2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4
7% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
67% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 5%
SDXC Card 64GB
46GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.7 10 10 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 12
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 10.8
20% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
47% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 41%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 84 96 97 88 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 92.6
129% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR648-PSB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 3650 Builds (Compare 1,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 3650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback