Toshiba Satellite C55-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 03:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 81
2-Core 162
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 396
46% 358 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA20) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 2.91
4% 4.26 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.09
5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 78 56 50 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 216
Write 82.5
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 64.2
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 9.9
42% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 84.1
73% 111 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55-A Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback