Toshiba Satellite C55-A

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '20 at 03:10
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 60.8 2-Core 122 55% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 288 32% 252 Pts	64-Core 289 18% 289 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA20) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5.62 Parallax 2.91 4% 4.26 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 8 5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 50 49 63 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 170 Write 82 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 54.2 21% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 18 4K Mixed 7.7 42% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 58.7 DQ Mixed 56.5 57% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.5 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 12.8 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-A Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-A

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	89x
Celeron 1037UIntelBench 43%, 2,458 samples	51x
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	41x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	125x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	91x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	46x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	6x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	16x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	12x
TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 620 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16