Lenovo 3285A1G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3285A1G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110110
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 13:12
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 41.4
2-Core 73
43% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 78.5
8-Core 81.9
11% 80.2 Pts
64-Core 80.7
5% 80.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.16
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd5003abyx-23 00W1135 00W1439IBM 500GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: WC36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 34 35 45 39 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 37.2
63% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 75%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
126GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 28.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 28.7
38% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback