Asrock H71M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics8.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H71M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '17 at 11:20
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 41
1-Core 34
2-Core 76.3
30% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 93.4
8-Core 103
13% 98.2 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 13.2
8% 12.3 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 9.57
Splatting 16.6
11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.3% Below average
Read 253
Write 175
Mixed 180
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 8.61
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 25.6
DQ Mixed 11.7
12% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 95%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
168GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 116
Write 133
Mixed 123
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.89
4K Mixed 0.46
131% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GIS 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H71M-DGS Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H71M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback