Asrock B75 Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 07:37
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 122
54% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 378
48% 366 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
42GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 350
Write 313
Mixed 245
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 32
110% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
156% 216 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 145
Mixed 68.6
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
203% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 75%
Samsung SP0812C 80GB
24GB free
Firmware: SU10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.8
Write 61.7
Mixed 38
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 32%
Samsung SP2014N 200GB
118GB free
Firmware: VC10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48
Write 54.3
Mixed 36.7
35% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 32%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 149
Write 156
Mixed 87.8
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
TomTom GO 4GB
0GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.7
4% 2.83 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
TomTom GO 2GB
0GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 1.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Read 5
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 0.3
2% 2.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback