Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 06:21
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
93% 164 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 650
74% 565 Pts
64-Core 722
48% 722 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB
CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 21.3
19% 21 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 17.9
15% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$80
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1106C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 681 443 481 437 261 336 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 2,140
Write 1,768
Mixed 562
SusWrite 440
272% 1,228 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 59.9
215% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 1,227
DQ Mixed 441
436% 666 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 213%
Great: 337%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
76GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 316 350 350 318 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 353
Mixed 290
SusWrite 336
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 40.3
161% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 64.7
127% 256 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$89
129GB free
Firmware: 3.AAJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 65 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 65
Write 43.4
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 66
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 44%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 16a5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 37 21 5.8 41 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 41.8
Write 10.4
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 21.5
27% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.8% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.8
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,526
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback