bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 00:44
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 55.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
64% 119 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 784
68% 581 Pts
64-Core 1,958
121% 1,958 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K280Q
Nvidia(10DE 113D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 370.41
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.43
Reflection 7
Parallax 8.84
4% 7.09 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 18
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1034
Write 1,550
Mixed 1,179
282% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 37.8
123% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 442
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 382
285% 382 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 30.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback