Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60 21,413 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 338 45% 338 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B A002) 1GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 12 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 15.7 10% 14.5 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 18.1 12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 51 63 48 51 56 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 407 Write 273 Mixed 271 SusWrite 59 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 15 94% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 90.5 DQ Mixed 12.8 23% 42 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 50GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 75 76 74 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 77.2 Write 77 Mixed 45.7 SusWrite 74.1 50% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.4 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	8x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16