Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T734

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK T734  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB279
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 21:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 156
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 233
30% 230 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 5.91
3% 4.78 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.43
4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NCSM50AF040M4 40GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 524ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 81 82 85 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
Read 189
Write 89.3
Mixed 124
SusWrite 82.2
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 14.5
47% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 102
77% 104 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 0467 RMT3150ED58E8W1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK T734 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T734

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback