Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 12:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 217
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 531
56% 447 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.4
17% 21.3 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 27
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 480GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 273 58 56 3.5 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 494
Write 350
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 140
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.2
56% 13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 99%
Liteonit LMT-32L3M mSATA 32GB
28GB free
Firmware: LWDA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 97 98 87 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 312
Write 99.8
Mixed 132
SusWrite 95.4
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 28.6
105% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 117
91% 128 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 115 108 103 116 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 112
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 113
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 100%
Inateck 960GB
893GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 224 223 226 226 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 234
Write 218
Mixed 183
SusWrite 225
290% 215 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 18.6
1,552% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 33.5
DQ Mixed 23.2
2,003% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 164%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback