Toshiba QOSMIO F755

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba QOSMIO F755  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '20 at 12:31
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
Socket rPGA988B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 120
57% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 183
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Toshiba(1179 0001) 1GB
CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 3.84
3% 4.26 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 2.96
3% 4.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-512 512GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 163 142 115 117 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.5% Below average
Read 222
Write 105
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 157
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 9.6
41% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 102%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 120GB
112GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 82 81 83 79 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 107
Mixed 116
SusWrite 82.2
150% 117 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 15.3
1,230% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 18.7
1,533% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 105%
Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QOSMIO F755 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO F755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback