MSI B360M MORTAR (MS-7B23)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B23
MotherboardMSI B360M MORTAR (MS-7B23)  (all builds)
Memory42.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display7680 x 4320 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 21:59
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,151
102% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,161
72% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 230
Parallax 235
170% 225 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 210
Splatting 143
160% 204 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 153%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1345 1842 1848 1525 1533 1538 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,581
Write 2,270
Mixed 1,732
SusWrite 1,605
459% 2,047 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 92.9
306% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,650
DQ Write 1378
DQ Mixed 1,480
1,118% 1,503 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 364%
Great: 410%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
113GB free
Firmware: 109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 295 103 109 127 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 585
Mixed 609
SusWrite 223
128% 573 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 48.5
182% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 328
272% 381 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 123%
Great: 157%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 187 197 197 198 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 147
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 192
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
WD easystore 2647 1TB
861GB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 127
Write 113
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 116
143% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.8
316% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 0.5
352% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 029E CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 859B BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 029E CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 48GB
2533, 2533, 2533, 2533 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 27.8
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M MORTAR (MS-7B23) Builds (Compare 2,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI B360M MORTAR (MS-7B23)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback