Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 15:14
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 178
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 266
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Asus(1043 02A8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 124 110 83 61 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 438
Write 385
Mixed 376
SusWrite 134
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 25.5
134% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 44.7
88% 170 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
248GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 86 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 86.2
Write 84.1
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 85.5
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-010.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback