HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJun 10 '14 at 09:38
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 148
53% 115 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 256
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 62%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.28
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.28
0% 1.12 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.15%
Great: 2%
Nvidia Quadro NVS 290
Nvidia(10DE 0492) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3250
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.45
Parallax 0.53
0% 0.54 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB
701GB free
Firmware: GKAOA9GA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 79.1
Write 69.4
Mixed 36.8
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.4
112% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 88.7
Mixed 28.6
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 6.56
4K Mixed 0.4
188% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52%
Great: 74%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
12GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.97% Terrible
Read 40.3
Write 12.1
Mixed 15.4
24% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.24
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.02
20% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 18%
Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback