HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory43.9 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 22:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5530
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 132
59% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 319
37% 287 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V7900 (FireGL V)
HP(103C 2B0C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 17.8
10% 16.7 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 24.2
16% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 121 119 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 121
SusWrite 120
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 19.2
62% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 93
DQ Mixed 96.2
72% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 36%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 121 121 119 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 121
SusWrite 120
28% 122 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 19
62% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 91.7
DQ Mixed 96.1
72% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 36%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback