Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5530 771 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 124 57% 91.9 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 372 39% 313 Pts	64-Core 636 39% 636 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro V7900 (FireGL V) 595 User benchmarks, average bench 14% HP(103C 2B0C) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Lighting 13 Reflection 19.5 Parallax 17.9 11% 16.8 fps	MRender 18.4 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 24.2 16% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 398GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 123 123 123 122 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.2% Below average	Read 128 Write 123 Mixed 122 SusWrite 122 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 19.1 62% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 92 DQ Mixed 96 72% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 466GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 123 123 123 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.6% Below average	Read 127 Write 122 Mixed 123 SusWrite 123 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 20.1 63% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 92.4 DQ Mixed 95.9 72% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 82GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.9% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 16.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.6 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16