ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 130% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 142% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	EVGA Default string
Motherboard	EVGA 131-HE-E095
Memory	61.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160830
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '17 at 23:50
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Memory 97.2 1-Core 137 2-Core 266 94% 166 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 1,122 97% 827 Pts	64-Core 1,894 117% 1,894 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Lighting 178 Reflection 207 Parallax 189 145% 191 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 186 Splatting 132 124% 153 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 930GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 403 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 41 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 64 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 942193628	91.3% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 406 Mixed 422 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 29.2 132% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 138 109% 144 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	273% Outstanding	Read 2,108 Write 1,815 Mixed 1,880 431% 1,935 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 66.4 240% 93 MB/s	DQ Read 42.1 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 28.1 38% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 353%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 9905240 (03) Spinup time 94 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 273 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 10624046 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4793 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 259 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 62 555745313 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 78 78 44231 (C2) HDA temperature 33 40 73014444065 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -44285407787562 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9491113431 (F2) Unknown 100 253 237155455714	87.4% Excellent	Read 159 Write 146 Mixed 145 113% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.22 77% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 4x16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	152% Outstanding	MC Read 65.7 MC Write 63.4 MC Mixed 52.2 173% 60.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 22.2 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 49.5 81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 153%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback