Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 17:38
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 114
2-Core 198
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 563
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.3% Good
Lighting 79
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 72.2
64% 75.3 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 55.4
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 379 411 276 360 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 427
Mixed 350
SusWrite 337
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 36
135% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 273
224% 321 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 119%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
158GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 74 78 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 49.8
Write 68.5
Mixed 48
SusWrite 75
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
634GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 111 111 116 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 89
Write 101
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 110
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 76%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
50GB free, PID 0577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 24.7
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 19.2
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 20%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
816GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 93 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 90.5
Write 91.9
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 92.6
116% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 60%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
145GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 23.4
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 18.7
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15%
Great: 20%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 155 162 163 163 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 61.7
Write 145
Mixed 111
SusWrite 154
175% 118 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
196% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 19
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback