Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '20 at 14:32
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 118 58% 91.6 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 425 41% 338 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 30 37 27 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 203 Write 176 Mixed 160 SusWrite 42.7 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 0.3 54% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 4.6 DQ Mixed 0.3 4% 9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 92%
Asmt 2115 500GB 793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 69GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 60 63 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 90.6 Write 73.6 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 61.6 45% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 55GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 29 38 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 77.3 Write 76.9 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 42.7 44% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 61%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$22 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 10GB free Firmware: 0003BSM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 29 34 35 35 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 57.7 Write 46.1 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 34.8 28% 39 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 7GB free Firmware: KC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 30 32 36 32 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 24.1 Write 54.2 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 33.9 24% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.3 163% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 7GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 30 34 36 34 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27% Poor	Read 59.2 Write 91.1 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 34.7 44% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 142% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 582GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 30 32 36 32 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 75.5 Write 17 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 33.9 33% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 19% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 106%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 8,520 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 11GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 24.1 Write 14.8 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 10.3 21% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.4 179% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 36%
Maxtor OneTouch 300GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 22.8 Write 20.3 Mixed 17.2 25% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
Seagate Portable 250GB 728 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 20GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.22% Terrible	Read 24.6 Write 21.3 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 12.7 25% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.22% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	534x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	263x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	255x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	158x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	449x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	259x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16