Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 13:59
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 139
59% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 419
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4939
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 6.44
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 15.1
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 29 31 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 3,451
Write 30.7
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 29.1
186% 893 MB/s
4K Read 386
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.9
592% 131 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 296%
Great: 235%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
666GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 123
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Kingston 9905624-045.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 18.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback