Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 251
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 703
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Graphics
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
24.5% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 49.5
Parallax 36.7
20% 37 fps
MRender 49.8
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 43.8
33% 39.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIe SS 1TB
668GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 949 826 846 801 841 770 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 1,142
Mixed 955
SusWrite 839
197% 863 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 61.7
262% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 807
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 240
380% 714 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 193%
Great: 293%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
745GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 162 162 162 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 142
Write 147
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 162
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%
JMicron Generic 512GB
339GB free, PID 0583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 37.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 41.6
54% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 13.8
1,065% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 20.5
DQ Mixed 16.2
1,300% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 316%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FARG 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback