Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 12:43
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 246
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 728
75% 602 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1475 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 64.9
52% 64.1 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 54.6
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1702 1652 1165 1705 867 496 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,523
Write 2,033
Mixed 248
SusWrite 1,265
336% 1,517 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 77.8
258% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 734
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 479
386% 551 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 285%
Great: 311%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 46 46 42 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 74
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 45.2
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33%
Great: 54%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
165GB free
Firmware: A3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 110 88 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 105
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FA1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback