Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	25.9% Poor	Memory 47.2 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 27.3 22% 30.1 Pts	4-Core 29.3 8-Core 29.2 4% 29.2 Pts	64-Core 28.7 2% 28.7 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3577) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.21 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 800 256GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: R042 SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 286 282 262 296 315 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 352 Write 315 Mixed 305 SusWrite 284 71% 314 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 11.4 37% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 69.9 DQ Write 61 DQ Mixed 68.8 51% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	206x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	91x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	82x

RAM
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	24x
HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 2,690 samples	21x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	20x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16