| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Pro3-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110427 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 26 '20 at 20:36 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
76%
Very good
|
71% 119 Pts
|
47% 355 Pts
|
22% 350 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
|
31.6%
Below average
|
32% 35.9 fps
|
31% 37.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 365 374 372 374 375 MB/s
|
78.4%
Very good
|
82% 362 MB/s
|
124% 41.4 MB/s
|
43% 61.4 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
8GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 75 75 75 80 80 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
51% 68.8 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Flash HS-MS/SD 16GB
3GB free, PID 2228
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
9.38%
Terrible
|
19% 14.7 MB/s
|
91% 1.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
51.1%
Above average
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
61% 65.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z68 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 147 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Pro3-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 47x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 28x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 8x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $306 |