Asus F2A85-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	14.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '20 at 19:48
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467 11,295 User benchmarks, average bench 51% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 76.3 2-Core 140 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 227 31% 230 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6161) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Lighting 75.5 Reflection 77.7 Parallax 75.9 62% 76.4 fps	MRender 81.7 Gravity 73.8 Splatting 74.4 62% 76.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Ct480bx5 0 480GB 896 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6C SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 245 226 6.9 7.2 6.5 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.7% Very poor	Read 198 Write 68.7 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 110 22% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 0% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 112GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 97 99 98 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 102 Write 97.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 96.9 66% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 375GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 85 124 107 101 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 130 Write 102 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 108 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB 292 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 10.5 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-M PRO Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M PRO

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	13x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	12x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	5x

SSD
SQ500S37480G 480GBKingstonBench 77%, 1,176 samples	3x
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	3x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	2x

RAM
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,116 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $88

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16