Micro 1720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro 1720  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo PB70EF-G
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 15:19
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 198
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 297
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Clevo(1558 67D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 54
Reflection 107
Parallax 104
44% 88.2 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 100
Splatting 70.7
83% 106 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 254 250 238 233 226 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 444
Mixed 432
SusWrite 256
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 50.2
170% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 330
247% 330 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
0GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 971
Write 1,362
Mixed 536
214% 956 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.3
181% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 495
372% 500 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
105GB free
Firmware: 101200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1149 842 847 852 854 822 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,686
Write 1,555
Mixed 1,344
SusWrite 894
307% 1,370 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 60
205% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 557
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 522
381% 500 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 208%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE160SO102408-2666 859B CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 25.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1720 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: Micro 1720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback